I promised that I would post some photos from my recent trip to Mexico. There are a great many as I took over 2000 photos. This will take me some weeks to process, so it will be a long running thread or threads.
Early on the 15th April, we left the hotel into which we had fallen after (for me) 17 hours of travel to Mexico city and a tedious 3 hr drive north. We headed up towards San Miguel Allende, but turned west before reaching that city passing the dam, and then took another left turn down a dirt road towards the village of Dolores. The spot we were looking for was quite easy to find, and we looked over the chalky soil to find 6 or 7 different cactus species. The Mammillarias there were M. zephyranthoides and M. heyderi ssp. gummifera, though there were many plants of Ferocactus latispinus, Coryphantha sp., Stenocactus phyllacanthus and Cylindropuntia imbricata.
Here are a few of the photos from that site:
This is one view of the site with a couple of the group searching.
Mammillaria zephyranthoides
A close up of the plant in the previous photo.
Mammillaria heyderi ssp. gummifera
A close up of the plant in the previous photo
A view of where one of the Mammillaria heydrei ssp. gummifera plants can be seen.
We also searched the canyon down which the now small steam from the dam runs, and there was a red spined Mammillaria way up on the side of the canyon. It was, I thought, either a form of M. rhodantha or of M. polythele. The photos had to be taken from a long distance and even with a 250mm lens, I can't be sure which it is.
Later in the day, after a couple of explorations which yielded nice plants but no Mamms, we were about 25kms from Queretaro where we were to stay the night, and searched an area which was full of Coryphanthas (ottonis and cornifera), but also M. heyderi ssp meiacantha (perhaps!!) and on a rock nearby a single plant of what I believe to be M. rettigiana.
This is the M. heyderi which could be ssp. meiacantha (or it could be ssp. gummifera again).
The plant which I think is M. rettigiana - it was the right location for it, and it seems to match the description, other than on some areoles it looks as though several of the central spines are hooked.
Closer in
Growing on the rock.
If anyone has a better idea of what these plants are, I'd be delighted to know, as I don't claim to be infallible about identification, as Ento in anther thread has realised!
I'll try to post some more tomorrow, hopefully.