Guest Guest
| Subject: What do you think? Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:46 am | |
| In my collection are some nameless plants, maybe you can help to identify it. My guess it's a M. rhodantha. Do you agree? Thanks so far for your help. Adios Amigos Ralf |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you think? Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:59 pm | |
| Hi Ralf,
I believe this could be M.polythele. M.rhodantha calls for 17 - 24 glassy white radial spines which this plant does not have.
Yours, Tam |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you think? Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:33 pm | |
| Hi Tam,
sure, of course. Sometimes I've a plank before my head. The simple things are often to far away. Many thanks for your help.
Greetings Ralf |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you think? Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:55 am | |
| Wow, M. polythele is sure variable. The dark spines are a lot like those of my M. polythele ssp obconella. That's one of my few cactus that came with a name because I bought it at a botanical garden here.
May I ask while on the polythele topic. I did not see M polythele nudum on Hugo's list here. Is it not a valid name?
Shmuel |
|
Chris43 Moderator
Number of posts : 1872 Age : 81 Location : Chinnor, UK Registration date : 2008-07-16
| Subject: Re: What do you think? Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:15 am | |
| Hi all, First off, Mammillaria polythele ssp obconella is typically a yellowish brown spined plant, and the spines are rather more curved than typically is the case with ssp. polythele. So if you have a dark spined plant, it may not be obconella, but probably just polythele. I attach a photo of obconella ML004 for your comparison. M. polythele nudum is just a form, probably a horticultural sport, and as such doesn't warrant inclusion is a classification. _________________ Chris43, moderator
| |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you think? Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:37 pm | |
| Ralf, your polythele is gorgeous and your obconella is really beautiful, Chris. Nice photos! I really have to rethink my polythele's. What I thought was M p polythele now seems to be more the obconella as you described above: Here is what was labelled obconella and probably now M p polythele: Just for the record, here is the "nudum" which I now understand is an inermis form of polythele. How would one write that? Mammillaria polythele "nudum"? These photos are a whole growing season ago - the plants are larger now - do they seem etiolated? They are on an east facing covered porch and get about 1 hour of very early direct sun. Thanks again! Shmuel |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you think? Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:47 pm | |
| For some growers M.obconella is species in its own right but for others it is a subspecies of M.polythele and should be written has M.poythele ssp obconella. The different is , of course, is the much longer spines in obconella. Has for nudum and inermis these are both the same plant and could be said to be a cultivated variety and should be written as ' Nudum ' or ' Inermis '
Tam. |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: What do you think? | |
| |
|